Category: November 2007

In the Spirit of Things

As many of us get ready for the half-yearly exams, we are also wondering with trepidation whether we will be able to instill a sense of seriousness in our wards, anxious about completing board syllabi, and possibly, recovering from a season of inter-school competitions and festivals. But it’s important to remember that these festivals and contests have an important role to play in facilitating an open and encouraging educational environment. We would all agree that teaching is a kind of transaction. Teachers introduce children to certain bodies of knowledge and encourage the development of certain skills. From their students, they gain an understanding of how learning happens, and the many forms creativity and self-expression can take. This learning is fed back into their own teaching so the cycle continues, regenerated each time with new inputs. But a cyclic process can happen only when there is openness on both sides; a true exchange of learning can take place only when there are no big barriers. This is why it is so important to preserve and use the spaces within schools where such barriers can be broken and relationships built between teachers and students that go beyond the delivery of the curriculum. Festivals and extra-curricular activities offer such spaces. They allow us to don new costumes, play different roles and relax a bit, so that we can all, children and adults alike, be just people. On Teachers’ Day, children become teachers and give their tutors a rest; on Children’s Day, teachers treat the children to presentations of their own talents, showing them that they care enough to make the kids laugh a little. Such spaces also allow us to let off some steam and cope with the anxieties and demands of academic performance. We need to make sure we don’t lose these opportunities, so that they can continue to give us a breathing space, all the way from kindergarten to the very last term of high school.

Read More »

An Uncommon Cause

Pawan Singh In the global village, the local is slowly being forgotten as privatisation increasingly informs development agendas. The Indian education system is an example of how this process is taking place, as government schools languish for want of better infrastructure and quality education, while private schools deliver at a premium. The commoditisation of education has gone on for decades given the tenet, ‘the more you pay, the more/better you can get’. This is more so at present, as going to school is being packaged as an experience of air-conditioned buses and classrooms, technologically sophisticated learning environments and snazzy ad campaigns screaming the difference between a school and a brand name. Quality, of course, remains a lost cause. While the elite minority in India is easily able to pay for this experience, the middle-classes cut corners to afford their children the ‘best’ there is in the name of education. Clearly, everybody wants to run in the race. But where does this leave those sections of society that are still struggling with government schools running on grossly inadequate facilities, irregular teaching staff, and economic pressures to send their children to work instead of school? Education then ends up becoming a paid-for experience, much like a holiday package, with different slabs for different strata of society. The constitutional rhetoric of equitable education for all thus stands reduced to lip-service as reforms do not resonate with changing governments. A case for common schools Borrowed primarily from Western models of education, such as those in the USA, UK and Europe, a common school system in India was first recommended in 1964 with a view to promote equitable access to education. The Education Commission (1964-66) had recommended a Common School of Public Education as the basis of building the National System of Education with a view to “bring the different social classes and groups together and thus promote the emergence of an egalitarian and integrated society.”1 The Kothari Commission on Education appointed by the Central Government headed by Dr. D.S. Kothari, then chairman of the University Grants Commission, critiqued the Indian education system for promoting social segregation and widening the class divide. The Commission’s report identified the disparities that existed at the primary and the secondary level of education by distinguishing between private and minority schools that catered to upper and middle class sections, and the publicly maintained government schools where quality of infrastructure and learning was inadequate. Recognising the higher quality of education provided by private institutions, the report

Read More »